The Krown of Thorns

The Question I ask is this… If one is diagnosed with brain cancer, should he/she get it cured or butcher the head of the body?
Under all circumstances, one must get it cured or give his/her best shot to cure it, this simple question related to the human body, in my opinion is the basis of the solution of an outsized brain cancer India is facing in the valley; If one will keep on moving with the swift breeze which is a hurricane under disguise, in the near future one will pay import duties on juicy apples and exotic saffron and require a visa to do an Amarnath pilgrimage. The valley is storming with anti India and Pro Pakistan rallies and this is fiercer than ever before its backbone is not gun power but a collective voice of the people who dwell there. I have strong reasons to refute with people who think that India must strip Kashmir from India’s geography and polity to have an ultimate solution to the problem, what can be done with this particular beautifully violent state? Should we just gift it to Pakistan and conclude the blunder called Simla Agreement? That will be hosting the flag our impotency and animalistic governance which was glorified in the Parliament by the humongous bundles of notes. Assuming that Kashmir becomes an official part of Pakistan, what comes as a guarantee that a Gujrat, Rajasthan or Punjab will not be flamed into another Kashmir?
When India was no longer under the British Crown, India’s crown was very much intact, when we look at the map of our nation we feel a sense of pride and glory to it with a crown like state honoring its head, so do we want our future generations to look at the map of our country and find it pointed at the top, a headless figure?
Going by the diplomatic humanitarian peace loving creatures, if Kashmir is granted the statues of a free state with its own self dependent governance and rights that any other nation has, will it not be forcefully captured by Pakistan? Or will not China make it a second Tibet? Under any of the two situations India will either have to got to War to save an ‘independent’ vulnerable Kashmir from the claws of Pakistan or provide refuge to the tens of thousands of people dislocated from their homeland due to Chinese invasion. One other thing we may suffer is worst than what India suffers now; terror camps mushroom and operate from POK, if India withdraws control from the valley, these undercover yet highly volatile terror camps will surface and start multiplying. In the long run, If Kashmir is butchered or surgically operated from India, it will inevitably result in a Khalistan, Naxal and Maoists control over the North East and LTT terror in Tamil Nadu, shrinking India's identity to mere Himachal, Delhi , Rajasthan and Gujrat, U.P, M.P, Maharashtra and Andhra. A nation which has a count over a billion and every sixth human on the planet is its representative cannot afford to be submissive. So what can be the solution to the problem?
What is the need to tamper with something which is going on peacefully for so many years? Let the Amarnath pilgrimage be carried out as it was in the past, the disputed 300 acres of the land shall be temporarily, for 3 months be used as a place for Shrine board Pilgrims and let it be uncontroversial for the rest of the year and as per the wider problem, hereon I may be thrashed by the majority for my Barberic views in this democratic ‘better’ world but a few centuries ago, I would have fetched myself Blue Knighthood for the same views. The fiercest of Wars are the strongest foundations of the longest lasting peace; Violence/War and religion have existed since infinity and will continue till infinity. India must have one border which serves as the international border for governance as well as the line of control, and it won’t come by bribes, neither by round table conferences… Haven’t we had enough of the patriarchal Sharafat and the hurricanes of Hurriyat, We need a dictator, a bold and courageous leader to implement at least 5 Blue Stars in the valley and either capture or lose what belongs to you by using your strategically planned physical force, A bold leader is vulnerable for criticism and downfall but his/her actions are never suppressed by force and words do no harm to him/her, World may criticize a powerful leader for waging a war on baseless grounds against a dictator but the end result led to the downfall of the dictator. When a big tree falls, the adjoining grass and small plants are uprooted, it’s the rule of nature, peace is delaying and maturing of a violence which comes with its interest, the more it’s delayed. Do or die is the need of the hour, We may claim to color the world with our progress and bright future ahead but one must be cautioned that is this brightness or a burning face? It is more plain to have a showdown once in for all and dictate by authority rather than suffer this stomach upset which constantly results in farts (bombasts), stinking the nation.
Is it not a more agreeable option to be at war and know that you go out to kill and get killed rather than being blasted at a marketplace?